Raise Taxes To Rein In A Growing Economy


The American polity recently tore itself apart debating the morality of adding $1.5 trillion in tax cuts to the national debt. Yet the $82 trillion avalanche of Social Security and Medicare deficits that will come over the next three decades elicits a collective shrug. Future historians — and taxpayers — are unlikely to forgive our casual indifference to what has been called “the most predictable economic crisis in history.”

Over the next 30 years, according to data from the Congressional Budget Office, Medicare will run a $40 trillion cash deficit, Social Security will run a $19 trillion cash deficit and the interest on the resulting program debt will be $23 trillion. (To inflation-adjust these figures, trim by one-third.)


CBO projects that, over the next 30 years, the national debt will grow from $20 trillion to $92 trillion ($52 trillion after inflation) — or much higher if interest rates return to historically typical levels.

More From:

Brian M. Riedl

Democrats’ bogus claims about who gets hit if Washington ditches the SALT write-off

Yes, US tax cuts will mainly benefit those who ... pay the most taxes

Sorry: Trump's 'heartless' budget doesn't slash the safety net

Fantasy jobs

The most bloated budget ever

Politicians brush aside the issue by promising easy fixes. Tax the rich? Doubling the 35 and 37 percent tax brackets to 70 and 74 percent would close just one-fifth of the long-term Social Security and Medicare shortfall. Even seizing all annual income earned over $500,000 would not come close. Popular proposals to more aggressively tax banks, investors, hedge-fund managers and oil and gas companies are a cumulative rounding error compared with these deficits.

On the spending side, slashing the defense budget to European levels would close just one-seventh of the gap. Cutting waste and foreign aid can close only a small percentage of it.

In reality, balancing the long-term budget without reforming Social Security and Medicare (and fast-growing Medicaid) would require either nearly doubling income-tax rates across the board or eliminating nearly every remaining federal function.

Steep economic growth could close only some of the shortfall. Growth rates will already be limited by the labor-force slowdown caused by baby boomer retirements and declining birth rates.

That leaves productivity to drive growth. Even assuming the white-hot 1.8 percent rate that prevailed from 1992 through 2005, the resulting higher incomes and tax revenues would seem to close 40 percent of the funding gap — until one accounts for the fact that higher incomes would automatically result in higher Social Security benefits when these workers retired.

Finally, there’s the argument that Social Security and Medicare represent an unbreakable, unamendable promise to the elderly, consequences be damned. Of course, today’s teenagers never signed up for this budget-busting deal. Besides, benefits have been repeatedly expanded far beyond what current retirees were promised while working.

see also

> Yes, US tax cuts will mainly benefit those who ... pay the most taxes Trending Hairstyles

Source : https://nypost.com/2018/03/05/uncle-sam-must-rein-in-retirement-benefits-or-were-headed-for-economic-disaster/

Uncle Sam must rein in retirement benefits or we’re headed for economic disaster
Economic slowdown confirmed as households rein in spending amid rising inflation and falling incomes
US Fed to raise rates with trade tensions on horizon
Japan government reiterates economy is gradually recovering
Rein in the Rich: How Higher Taxes Could Lift the Economy
To aid their finally, barely positive economic growth, France decides to… raise taxes. Again.
Risks to 'Abenomics' growing, whether Japan PM raises tax or not
Trump’s tax reform reaps benefits for Missourians
Keep taxes low and rein in government spending
Get ready. Republicans want to cut taxes again.